[arch-dev-public] Kingsoft Office License
felixonmars at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 09:02:37 EDT 2014
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'm going to give some quick answers to what I
have in mind:
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 21:31:50 Allan McRae wrote:
> - Distributed as a deb file
> - Requires libpng12 (why is that in [community]...)
I've mentioned this to them just one day ago. Actually the PKGBUILD will be
re-written once the issues on license were solved. I'll also mention
particularly about libpng12, to see if a specific version with latest libpng
can be made available.
> - I don't trust licenses with multiple obvious typos
> - Is linking at runtime "integrating" with other software
> - Are dontations to Arch counted as us making a profit from having it in
> our repos?
> - The terms indicate we are legally responsible to stop (e.g.) Manjaro
> redistributing this.
I'll forward these questions/problems to them.
> - we have to comply with PRC export laws and restrict distribution by
Unfortunately I don't think they can do much about the export laws - But after
a quick look, I don't see any more regional limitations in the laws than the
restrictions by UN (I may be wrong since I'm not a lawyer, though). And
currently skype, steam and flashplugin in our repos are also subjected to the
U.S. export laws.
> Overall, that is a no from me. It is a deb, so "packaging" is no burden
> for its users.
It would still be nicer to have popular software in our repos - but of course
they have to meet our essential requirements. Only after the licensing issues
been addressed, I'd like to ask again about the inclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the arch-dev-public