[arch-dev-public] On pushing a standalone opencv 3.x
arojas at archlinux.org
Fri Dec 4 17:41:36 UTC 2015
Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and push 3.x, which should
> co-exist fine with 2.x. I suppose it's OK to break our naming
> convention in cases like these.
Have you checked if this is actually still needed? At least KDE packages
(digikam, kipi-plugins, libkface) support opencv3 already.
More information about the arch-dev-public