[arch-dev-public] On pushing a standalone opencv 3.x

[Antonio Rojas]

Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:

> 
> If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and push 3.x, which should
> co-exist fine with 2.x. I suppose it's OK to break our naming
> convention in cases like these.
> 

Have you checked if this is actually still needed? At least KDE packages 
(digikam, kipi-plugins, libkface) support opencv3 already.