[arch-dev-public] Conclusion: DKMS modules

Gaetan Bisson bisson at archlinux.org
Wed Apr 13 05:13:24 UTC 2016

[2016-04-13 02:05:13 +0200] Sébastien Luttringer:
> I started promoting a way to manage o-o-t modules with only dkms.
> During the discussion, providing binary modules make consensus. So, I made a
> concession and moved to a position close to yours, which can be sum as, if we
> provide binary modules, we should provides them for all kernels.

That's not at all how I understood your last message. I'm sorry you had
to take a break from Arch and I apologize if my reply was part of the
problem in any way, but I still think what you said goes against most of
the views other developers have expressed in this thread.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20160412/16674501/attachment.asc>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list