[arch-dev-public] Discussion about optional dependencies

Sven-Hendrik Haase sh at lutzhaase.com
Tue Jul 19 02:21:57 UTC 2016


On Jul 19, 2016 03:56, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> [2016-07-19 11:13:22 +1000] Allan McRae:
> > My opinion is the primary binary for a
> > package should run out of the box.  If you really need to reduce
> > dependencies, then a split package should be considered.
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> --
> Gaetan

I also agree with that reasoning.

Sven


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list