[arch-dev-public] Discussion about optional dependencies
sh at lutzhaase.com
Tue Jul 19 02:21:57 UTC 2016
On Jul 19, 2016 03:56, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson at archlinux.org> wrote:
> [2016-07-19 11:13:22 +1000] Allan McRae:
> > My opinion is the primary binary for a
> > package should run out of the box. If you really need to reduce
> > dependencies, then a split package should be considered.
> That makes sense to me.
I also agree with that reasoning.
More information about the arch-dev-public