[arch-dev-public] ImageMagick 7

[Antonio Rojas]

El Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:18:44 +0000, Jan Alexander Steffens via
arch-dev-public escribió:

> 
> That's the question. I'm not even sure (but more confident) that we need
> libmagick6. I have the complete set ready, but we can still drop the
> packages that we later determine are not needed.

Last time a tried not a single package that links to libmagick was building with 7, so I'd be surprised if libmagick6 wasn't needed.