[arch-dev-public] ImageMagick 7
arojas at archlinux.org
Sat Dec 2 20:25:38 UTC 2017
El Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:18:44 +0000, Jan Alexander Steffens via
> That's the question. I'm not even sure (but more confident) that we need
> libmagick6. I have the complete set ready, but we can still drop the
> packages that we later determine are not needed.
Last time a tried not a single package that links to libmagick was building with 7, so I'd be surprised if libmagick6 wasn't needed.
More information about the arch-dev-public