[arch-dev-public] Arch Linux Container and Boxes

Christian Rebischke Chris.Rebischke at archlinux.org
Thu Jun 1 20:36:06 UTC 2017

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:09:17PM +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> Except removing it or not doesn't have much to do with this. Systemd is
> completely pointless in a container, especially for Docker. As pactree
> -r shows:
>   iptables
>   ├─iproute2
>   └─systemd
>     └─libusb
>       └─libpcap
>         └─iptables
> So the problem is that iproute2 requires iptables. Personally I don't
> see a use case for any of them in single-process containers, but I guess
> it would be just faster to disable iptables support in iproute2.
> Bartłomiej

We have discussed this in #archlinux-projects. Even the whole `iptables`
package is without sense, because all network is managed via docker.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20170601/3be7f6cb/attachment.asc>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list