[arch-dev-public] Adding a "posix" metapackage

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Sat Jan 4 03:08:05 UTC 2020


On 4/1/20 12:47 pm, Sébastien Luttringer via arch-dev-public wrote:
> One unfortunate consequence could be to have packages rely on it to make
> dependencies shorter, and make us pull cups or cronie.

What?!  That is like saying one unfortunate consequence of pamcan hooks
is that packages can have no files and just download and compile the
source in a hook.  It is a ridiculous consideration.

A


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list