[arch-dev-public] [RFC] archweb nvchecker integration
Frederik Schwan
freswa at archlinux.org
Sun Feb 6 16:20:53 UTC 2022
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 09:25:41PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote:
> We’ve wanted automatic flagging packages out of date for a while and
> currently every packager has to come up with it’s own solution. Let’s solve
> this centralized by integrating nvchecker into archweb.
>
> nvchecker is a program which can monitor versions upstreams, github, pypi,
> haskell, crates.io or custom provided for updates. Various packagers already
> use nvchecker in some form. [1]
>
> The idea is that every package in svn has a .NVCHECKER file
> (linux/trunk/.NVCHECKER) which contains the package specific settings i.e.:
>
> [go]
> source = “github”
> github = “golang/go”
> prefix = “go”
> use_max_tag = true
> exclude_regex = “.(release|weekly|rc|alpha|beta).”
>
> Archweb will have a systemd service which regularly goes through the
> pkgbases, check if the file exists, runs nvchecker and if required flags the
> package out of date automatically.
>
> For Github sources a token is required so we can do 5000 requests per hour,
> Arch Linux already has a Github account so this is no issue.
>
> Felix already has a script which converts a subset of packages to nvchecker.
> This could be extended to apply to more packages. [2]
>
> The question is if anyone object to checking these small .NVCHECKER files
> into our svn repository. If there are no real objections, I'll start
> implementing this functionality into archweb in two weeks.
>
> [1] https://nvchecker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage.html#check-crates-io
> [2]
> https://github.com/felixonmars/archlinux-futils/blob/master/arch-to-nvchecker
>
> Greetings,
>
> Jelle van der Waa
Using nvchecker for a couple of years now not only for Arch packages,
but also for a lot of IoT devices, hobby equipment and more. Pretty
happy with nvchecker-notify :)
An integration into Archweb would be awesome. Do we remove the ability
to mark packages out-of-date manually then? It seems to me that a broken
nvchecker config in a certain repo is more a bug than an ood package
after such an addition.
Best regards,
Frederik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 358 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20220206/e26f1b09/attachment.sig>
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list