[arch-devops] Changing the monitoring for new servers

Bartłomiej Piotrowski bpiotrowski at archlinux.org
Wed May 11 07:02:16 UTC 2016

On 2016-05-05 15:57, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> Would be interested in hearing your thoughts. If you have something to
> add, just add numbered bullet points. If nothing comes of this, we'll
> probably go back to munin.
> Sven

I completely fail to see any advantages of 2 and 5. Prometheus isn't
much older that what I proposed with InfluxDB stack (and I didn't
mention Ansible usage there for alerting).

I'd really like to give Sensu a shot, but I already said some snarky
comments about complicated projects with the need of MQ, so let's skip it.

Given that there is Grafana plugin for Zabbix, I guess it's the best
option considering our low number of machines to monitor. It covers both
graphing and alerting, so sounds very good to me. We should also
consider promoting its AUR maintainer as I remember he packages it for
quite a long time and PKGBUILD is quite flawless.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-devops/attachments/20160511/f776825d/attachment.asc>

More information about the arch-devops mailing list