[arch-devops] Diskspace getting low on orion or let's get a bigger archive server

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 05/06/2020 05:24, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-devops wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 05:14, Phillip Smith via arch-devops
> <arch-devops at lists.archlinux.org
> <mailto:arch-devops at lists.archlinux.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 12:19, Sven-Hendrik Haase via arch-devops
>     <arch-devops at lists.archlinux.org
>     <mailto:arch-devops at lists.archlinux.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
>         I'll reiterate the suggestion I made before: Let's get an SX62
>         and never worry about the archive space again. It's 10€ more. If
>         we want to get it fast, we'll have to order it from the Helsinki
>         location as we can expect long waiting times right now in their
>         German locations (up to 10 workdays for the SX62 according to
>         them). With your AX51 suggestion, we'll have an effective 8TB
>         (RAID1) for 54€/m (Helsinki location) but with the SX62 we'll
>         have an effective 30TB (RAID5) for 64€/m (Helsinki location). It
>         seems like a much better bang for the buck to me.
> 
> 
>     A 30tb RAID5 is terrifying to my mind.
> 
> 
> We can make it RAID6 but we'll have backups anyway.

Softraid or btrfs raid? I guess Phillipe's concern is the downtime when
replacing a faulty disk and rebuilding the array? And since this will
host dbscripts it's critical infrastructure.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-devops/attachments/20200605/01bd7a09/attachment.sig>