[arch-general] Kernel Module Package Guidelines
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 11:59:44 EST 2007
On Dec 3, 2007 12:09 AM, Michael Towers <gradgrind at online.de> wrote:
> I can live with the situation as it is, I actually only wanted to point
> out a possible inconsistency and an easy and painless way to remove it.
Well, actually - and here's the reason I'm being defensive here. You
pointed out the inconsistency on the bug tracker, and the package
maintainer said "no", so you escalated the issue to the community at
large. It's that escalation that is tiresome to me.
Now, excepting all that, in a way, I agree with you to a small extent.
If the author specifically lists the utils as optional, then they're
optional. Request a reopening of the bug report linking to that
More information about the arch-general