[arch-general] alternate dependencies?
Neil Darlow
neil at darlow.co.uk
Mon Apr 21 02:30:37 EDT 2008
Hi,
Seeing the earlier post re. tetex and texlive perhaps there is a case
for extending pacman to support alternate dependencies.
By this I mean a package could depend on one of a choice of packages.
The syntax could be something like:
depends=( tetex|texlive )
where the individual dependencies retain their current features e.g.
versions etc.
Opinions welcomed.
Regards,
Neil Darlow
More information about the arch-general
mailing list