[arch-general] alternate dependencies?
    Neil Darlow 
    neil at darlow.co.uk
       
    Mon Apr 21 02:30:37 EDT 2008
    
    
  
Hi,
Seeing the earlier post re. tetex and texlive perhaps there is a case 
for extending pacman to support alternate dependencies.
By this I mean a package could depend on one of a choice of packages. 
The syntax could be something like:
depends=( tetex|texlive )
where the individual dependencies retain their current features e.g. 
versions etc.
Opinions welcomed.
Regards,
Neil Darlow
    
    
More information about the arch-general
mailing list