[arch-general] mozilla /usr move

[Grigorios Bouzakis]

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:36:55PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit:
> > > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part
> > > > > of the /usr move
> > > >
> > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of
> > > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists.
> > > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally
> > > > forgot to.
> > >
> > > Is it just the empty dir - ie no files inside?  It may be inefficient,
> > > but pacman -Ql | grep /opt/mozilla/lib will see if any packages create
> > > it (since I don't think you can do -Qo on a dir)
> > >
> >
> > It was just the directory otherwise it would be easy to find out with
> > -Qo. Its been like 10 days i have removed the directory and the path
> > may be a bit deifferent, not sure 100%. And by the way it was a fresh
> > install on my reborn 2nd Archlinux installation. I have firefox &
> > flashplugin only installed so its probably one of them creating it later
> > for some reason when run.
> > People updating now, and not only, should be able to verify this.
> >
> > Greg
> 
> Looks like the mozilla-common package.  It still keeps the legacy dirs
> around just in case some old packages need it.
>
Ah, right. thanks for pointing this out.