[arch-general] What should be done with octave?

Neil Darlow neil at darlow.co.uk
Fri Feb 8 11:58:26 EST 2008


Xavier wrote:
> By the way, there are two PKGBUILDs of octave 3 in AUR : octave-devel 
> and octave3.

There seems to be some confusion between the two but octave-devel 
appears to be more complete.

I just thought that, as octave-3.0.0 is stable, it might be a good idea 
to have a version of it in extra so that octave-2.1.x can die a slow 
death ;-)

Neil Darlow

More information about the arch-general mailing list