[arch-general] Comment box in flag package Out-of-date

[Roman Kyrylych]

2008/1/9, bardo <ilbardo at gmail.com>:
> 2008/1/9, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> > Right. Let me rephrase that a little. I don't think they need
> > explanations that would overflow that box, except for possible URL
> > runoff, but that's to be expected
>
> I think I'm with Karolina here, I remember I had the same impression a
> couple of times. It happened, if I want to speed up the upgrade and
> save some work to the maintainer, that I'd send a full PKGBUILD. If
> the update is non-trivial, that is.
>

I have nothing against increasing the size of out-of-date comment box,
but in case of large text, PKGBUILDs, even tarballs - send this
directly to maintainer by email.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)