[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] licenses: GPL permutations

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 18:29:14 EDT 2008

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/4/1, Loui <louipc.ist at gmail.com>:
>  > > Do we need a GPL1 and GPL1+?
>  >
>  > Seems like we would need a GPL1. GPL1+ is logically the same as GPL
>  >  since there are no previous versions (are there?)
>  I haven't seen a single piece of code licensed under GPLv1 ever. :-)

Ok. How about this. Lets assume "GPL" means 1.0 and up. Problem solved
because it will... *ahem, let me clear my throat* never ever ever ever
ever ever happen.

More information about the arch-general mailing list