[arch-general] [*] Re: In defense of pacman.static

[Piyush P Kurur]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:12:55PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> ludovic coues wrote:
>> It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose.
>> By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade
>> itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame.
>>
>> I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf
>>   
>
> Its not actually...  it is a bug with pacman's deps.  It requires 
> libarchive>=2.7.0-2 and not just 2.7.0
>
> Allan

	Do I report this bug ?

Regards

ppk