[arch-general] [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

[Denis A. Altoé Falqueto]

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Brendan Long <korin43 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Let me illustrate the problem here by construction an argument with a
>> similar flaw:
>>
>> "The mouse is inflexible and should be deprecated, as a stylus has the
>> advantage of being cordless. All modern pointing devices should be
>> cordless and i think these mouse users are just from the 60s."
>
> Furthermore, no application should ever be built with support for
> styluses because some applications have buggy stylus support and adding
> support for something I don't need is against the Arch Way(tm).

After all these replies I can see that there are very few and
questionable technical reasons against DBus. There are just some pet
peeves that can be avoided with a little common sense and good will,
both things that we always think we have in excess and the others have
in shortage.

Well, I thanks for the answers and think it was fun, even if just for
the wannabe anthropologist in me.

Best wishes.

-- 
A: Because it obfuscates the reading.
Q: Why is top posting so bad?

-------------------------------------------
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
-------------------------------------------