[arch-general] ArchLinux AntiDesktop (was: Another rant on arch way abuse and false promises)
Christos Nouskas
nous at archlinux.us
Mon Dec 7 23:39:02 EST 2009
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > I know, but why would anyone in their right mind put some tro^Wguy's
> > custom repo _before_ the official ones, especially when the provided
> > packages are not the nightly builds of <insert_your_fav_app> but ones
> > like xorg-server?
>
> In the preceding conversations some have said they would. The whole
> point of his repo is to maintain separate versions of xorg-server sans
> some bloat.
IMO, custom packages providing different functionality (or having
important different dependencies for that matter) should have different
names, e.g. nvidia-beta, kernel26-bfs, skype-oss, [kdemod-*], [nightly].
At the very least, it allows for for faster troubleshooting. Again, IMO.
--
X.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list