[arch-general] imagemagick without X dependency

Rodrigo Flores mail at rodrigoflores.org
Sat Feb 7 21:57:52 EST 2009

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to have an imagemagick package without it depending on
> xt and libx11?
Although some imagemagick applicatives need X (the "display" obviously
is one example of that), others doesn't. One example is the "convert",
it converts a picture to another format (jpg to png or gif to eps). I
have a friend that uses this applicative to convert files on his
website, which runs in a server without X.
>  >
> --
> damjan

Rodrigo L. M. Flores
Computer Science Student - IME - USP
Homepage (en): http://www.rodrigoflores.org
Blog (pt-BR): http://blog.rodrigoflores.org
Linux User # : 351304
Jabber: im at rodrigoflores.org

More information about the arch-general mailing list