[arch-general] Moonlight 1.0

[stefan-husmann at t-online.de]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:05:47 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> From: Allan McRae 
> To: General Discusson about Arch Linux 

> stefan-husmann at t-online.de wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > 
> > > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100
> > > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
> > > From: Amanai 
> > > To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux"
> > >  
> > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn
> > >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th.
> > > > > Will this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > Currently the SVN version of Moonlight is available via AUR, the
> > > > package is called "moon-svn."
> > > > 
> > > > Thomas
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > I pick this up. I don't want to build it and upload moonlight for
> > > AUR.
> > > I don't want to use any packages from AUR.
> > > 
> > > Archlinux have in Extra Repo's
> > > 
> > > flashplugin
> > > swfdec
> > > gnash
> > > libflashsupport
> > > 
> > > it is just missing "moonlight"!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > File a feature request.
> > 
> 
> In all honesty, I would close this as a "won't fix".  If no-one is
> motivated enough to make a package for the stable version for this in
> the AUR and the community does not then vote for it, the demand is
> obviously not high enough for it to be included in the main repos.
> 
> Allan
> 
> 
> 
> 
Hello, 

I agree perfectly. But  it would be the correct way to handle things
like that, and would put some noise away from this list. 

BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules for
putting something new to extra.

Regards Stefan