[arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

[Allan McRae]

bardo wrote:
> 2009/7/15 bardo <ilbardo at gmail.com>:
>   
>> It worked for me, but it seems it did not for the user, so I'm waiting
>> to know which mirror he uses and readelf's output.
>>     
>
> He uses archlinux.puzzle.ch... I had problems in the last few days
> with it too, so I switched to another one, maybe this caused the
> issue. Anyway, here's readelf's output:
>
> -----
> Dynamic section at offset 0x31d05c contains 34 entries:
>   Tag        Type                         Name/Value
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libz.so.1]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libbz2.so.1.0]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libgd.so.2]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libjpeg.so.62]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libfontconfig.so.1]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libfreetype.so.6]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libpng12.so.0]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libmagic.so.1]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libm.so.6]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libdl.so.2]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libstdc++.so.6]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libpthread.so.0]
>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.6]
>  0x0000000c (INIT)                       0x804c9f8
>  0x0000000d (FINI)                       0x83468ac
>  0x00000004 (HASH)                       0x8048168
>  0x6ffffef5 (GNU_HASH)                   0x8048b78
>  0x00000005 (STRTAB)                     0x804a510
>  0x00000006 (SYMTAB)                     0x8048d60
>  0x0000000a (STRSZ)                      5312 (bytes)
>  0x0000000b (SYMENT)                     16 (bytes)
>  0x00000015 (DEBUG)                      0x0
>  0x00000003 (PLTGOT)                     0x83661dc
>  0x00000002 (PLTRELSZ)                   2616 (bytes)
>  0x00000014 (PLTREL)                     REL
>  0x00000017 (JMPREL)                     0x804bfc0
>  0x00000011 (REL)                        0x804be78
>  0x00000012 (RELSZ)                      328 (bytes)
>  0x00000013 (RELENT)                     8 (bytes)
>  0x6ffffffe (VERNEED)                    0x804bcc8
>  0x6fffffff (VERNEEDNUM)                 7
>  0x6ffffff0 (VERSYM)                     0x804b9d0
>  0x00000000 (NULL)                       0x0
> -----
>
> It indeed points to .62, but on my installation the same binary does
> not! I'm not very familiar with readelf, could you please clarify if
> the output is right?
>   

Strange - both using the same architecture?