[arch-general] Perplexing libjpeg-related packaging issue

[Thomas Bächler]

bardo schrieb:
> 2009/7/15 bardo <ilbardo at gmail.com>:
>> Yes, i686, but just to be sure I checked on both arches, and I get the
>> new version.
> 
> The problem has been solved by switching repos. Could it be that
> mldonkey just linked to libjpeg.so, and readelf recurred to
> libjpeg.so.62, while the program said it didn't find the library
> because the internal offset was for another version?
> 

What readelf said is what is written in the binary. If the binary says 
libjpeg.so.62, then it's an old binary!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090715/17319898/attachment.pgp>