[arch-general] What to do about the "blender" package?
ordo.ad at gmail.com
Sun Jul 19 21:46:25 EDT 2009
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:28:51PM +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 19.07.2009 12:42, Alessandro Doro wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:29:20PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> >> 2009/7/19 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky at gmail.com>:
> >>> IMO the problem is that you (devs) use make to build blender which is
> >>> several years deprecated and probably no-one builds blender this way.
> >>> Maybe they've dropped support for it completely. I suggest using
> >>> SCons. Maybe you can reuse my blender-svn PKGBUILD from AUR, only
> >>> thing that has to be changed for this purpose is the part where data
> >>> is downloaded from SVN server.
> >>> There is one problem which I'm aware of with this package – it
> >>> installs blender executable in /usr/share/blender and adds wrapper to
> >>> /usr/bin. I'll probably move blender to /opt in near future.
> >> There is also a request about building to SCons:
> >> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14893
> >> and there is a PKGBUILD too (for stable, not svn version).
> > That PKGBUILD needs a cleanup; depends and makedepends are wrong.
> > I'll soon post an updated version.
> > FYI I had success with the NaN method.
> > The "key" is (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14766#comment46628):
> > export NAN_DEBUG=-O
> > Today I'll work for a PKGBUILD.
> I fixed both packages and uploaded them. Take whichever you want.
So you're providing a (scons) PKGBUILD for x86_64 with '-march=i686' and
'-mtune=generic' compile flags?
Note that all you need (no sedding) for the NaN method is, not reviewed:
and a patch (assuming we DO want sound):
- NAN_SND_LIBS += $(NAN_OPENAL)/lib/libopenal.a
+ NAN_SND_LIBS += -lopenal
More information about the arch-general