[arch-general] Bugs again
couesl at gmail.com
Thu May 14 10:42:25 EDT 2009
for me, a bug tracker is for tracking bug. For an upstream issue, the
bug is spotted, reported to the bug tracker, and flagged upstream.
Why it'll be closed at this point ?
While there no patch to correct the bug, the bug is still here, and
need to be tracked. So closing a bug report before resolving the bug
is Bad, even if it's an upstream issue.
That's how I see bug tracker and I wonder why it's not like this.
Am I wrong ?
More information about the arch-general