[arch-general] Problem w/Digest?

[Keith]

Below are the 1st and last messages contained in the copy of Vol. 55 #44 
I received, dated May 24, 5:56 PM EDT.

Note the timestamp on message #1: May 23, 9:17 AM UTC. Yet the message 
quoted within message #10, timestamped May 24, 11:52 UTC, isn't in the 
digest (or anywhere else I can find). I've noted this numerous times 
recently and wrote it off to a lousy memory. But it's clearly more than 
that. Are these cross-posts being replied to? Is the digest dropping 
messages?

Thanks...K




Message: 1
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:17:27 +0000
From: Baho Utot <baho-utot at columbus.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
Message-ID: <1243070247.15748.7.camel at desktop.bildanet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:

> > Baho Utot wrote:
>   
>> > > I am missing something here ?
>> > >
>> > >
<snip>

Message: 10
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:55:59 +0300
From: Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up
To: arch-general at archlinux.org
Message-ID: <20090524215559.GA3136 at dark>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote:

> > Tobias Powalowski schrieb:
>   
>> >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra
>>     
> >
> > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the  
> > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X  
> > releases.
> >
>   

The first three were moved to core not extra.
Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was
before.

-- Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment 
was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature 
Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: 
<http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090525/b1695e2d/attachment.pgp>