[arch-general] Sign-offs for community-testing?

Ng Oon-Ee ngoonee at gmail.com
Sat Apr 3 19:26:08 EDT 2010

On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 10:42 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> 2010/4/3 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee at gmail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I noticed a new pulseaudio in [community-testing], do request for
> > sign-offs for that come to [arch-dev-public] as well? Or the AUR ML
> > (which I'm not on)?
> Neither.
> 1. If signoffs are requested, a developer will always start a [signoff] thread
> 2. Packages in non-core repos typically don't need signoffs unless
> there is a compelling reason
> 3. [testing] is used for rebuilds in addition to new [core] packages;
> all these packages are in testing due to the openssl rebuild

Thanks for the clarification Dan. I did not think it was on the openssl
list as it wasn't on the list Allan posted up in the forums previously.

More information about the arch-general mailing list