[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

Simon Stoakley s_stoakley at hotmail.co.uk
Tue Aug 3 11:14:44 EDT 2010


On 03/08/10 09:51, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> 2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský<l.jirkovsky at gmail.com>:
>> On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski<t.powa at gmx.de>  wrote:
>>> Latest kernel is in testing,
>>> please signoff for both arches.
>>>
>>> I already have
>>> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
>>>
>>> greetings
>>> tpowa
>>> --
>>> Tobias
>>> Powalowski
>>> Archlinux Developer&  Package Maintainer
>>> (tpowa)
>>> http://www.archlinux.org
>>> tpowa at archlinux.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I get following error on x86_64:
>> (1/1) checking for file conflicts                  [####################] 100%
>> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>> kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.devname exists in filesystem
>> kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.softdep exists in filesystem
>>
>> but it may be due to the experiments with kernel26-rc I did earlier today.
>
> I get this too (on x86_64; didn't check on i686), when trying to
> upgrade from 2.6.34.1-1. Also, no package owns those two files, but
> the rest of the /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.* files are owned by
> kernel26 2.6.34.1-1.
>
>
I also get this, if it's safe to pacman -Sf this, wouldn't it be a good 
idea to put up a news item,(as i think someone suggested earlier) to 
stop the forum getting flodded with posts and also to let people know 
(it is the kernel after all). Just a thought.


More information about the arch-general mailing list