[arch-general] Patent protection
Peter Lewis
plewis at aur.archlinux.org
Thu Dec 9 06:05:02 EST 2010
On Thursday 09 December 2010 11:00:43 Mauro Santos wrote:
> > If Microsoft wants to get you, they will do so anyways, OIN member or
> > not. OIN does not have a patent license for ALL patents that are being
> > sold, and even if they had them, Microsoft has several other trivial
> > patents like the ones on VFAT that can be used to sue everybody.
> > Newsflash: they don't.
> > Remember Google getting sued by Oracle? Both are OIN members, it's just
> > a fact that not all patents owned by Oracle are shared with OIN, so
> > Oracle is free to sue any OIN-member that uses those patents without a
> > license.
>
> I have to agree that MS isn't going after the small guys, it's not
> profitable. I also have to agree with Ng Oon-Ee that joining may be
> raising the subjective value of the patents.
>
> However if joining is free and there are no maintenance costs, being
> protected from some patents is better than nothing, even if MS or any
> other party have other patents in their arsenal that can make the small
> guys close the shop if they want to.
>
> It would be interesting to know what other distros are doing, specially
> the larger ones which might be a target first.
My view would be that we need to reject even the idea of stuff like this. It's
just FUD, and quite effective FUD at that.
Pete.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list