[arch-general] We want to help

[Ignacio Galmarino]

Because writing javascript that is compatible con every mayor browser
"by hand" is a very hard work

Ignacio

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:14 PM, C Anthony Risinger <anthony at extof.me>wrote:
>
>> the benefit to the pyjs approach is 100% client side operation, so it
>> can run without online access.  additionally, the python-DOM version
>> (or the pyjs version if proxying thru a local daemon) could
>> potentially direct install from the website, leading to "install now"
>> functionality.  lastly, python means you could use the same lang to
>> write the front end and the backend, and communicate using JSON
>> messages.
>>
>> as a professional web applications developer by day, i can vouch that
>> writing webapps requires knowledge of about 4 different haphazardly
>> implemented "standards", requiring far to much painfully acquired
>> knowledge.  by using a library like pyjamas, you allow anyone with
>> python experience to write incredibly functional plugins/modules, and
>> share maintenance load.  django is a great platform, but after i
>> discovered pyjamas about 1yr ago, i haven't looked back, and am
>> convinced that compiler technology is the only sane way to develop
>> complex and maintainable web-based applications.
>>
>
> Out of curiosity why is everyone so again just writing Javascript? Everyone
> seems to want to write in some other language and then compile to Javascript
> these days. --Kaiting.
>
> --
> Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
>