[arch-general] core/linux-api-headers?

[Xavier Chantry]

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Brendan Long <korin43 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like the real problem is pacman's message then. My suggestion:
> change "package x has been replaced by package y" to "package x has been
> renamed package y".
>

fork/alternative != rename

The term 'replace' is more general than a rename. And it's consistent
with the implementation :
the PKGBUILD variable is called replaces and the db entry is called REPLACES.

Are you all suggesting that we introduce renames/RENAMES in PKGBUILD
and in the database ?
Because that would make things less confusing ? It looks much more
confusing to me.