[arch-general] A suggestion for the devs regarding rebuilds
fons at kokkinizita.net
fons at kokkinizita.net
Mon Feb 8 18:20:01 EST 2010
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:54 PM, <fons at kokkinizita.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:36:55AM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >
> >> you are focusing only on .so which is different but this schema will
> >> work only if the package is split in lib, -dev, whatever as now, the
> >> headers will conflict since it have the same name on the same
> >> location.
> >
> > Not true. When a new version is installed, the
> > headers are replaced, and the symlink from
> > 'libfoo.so' is modified to the new version.
>
> pacman doesn't deal in symlinks in this manner. I think your
> understanding of WHAT a package is is a little off.
So *who* creates the symlink from libfoo.so ->
libfoo.so.1.2.3 ? It's either pacman or ldconfig
called by pacman. Unless you believe in little
gremlins doing it while you sleep.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
More information about the arch-general
mailing list