[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Samba package sizes

[Tobias Powalowski]

Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Xavier Chantry:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
> 
> <rogutes at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Dan McGee (2010-02-26 19:09):
> >> Guys, does anyone else think this is getting out of hand?
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> >> Seriously, 45 f-ing MB for samba? How can that be possible?
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> > Samba is growing up fast.
> > It is long known upstream ( http://bugs.debian.org/474543 ) and already
> > anecdotal: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-December/152549.html
> 
> I just read the debian bug, it would be interesting to have a status
> update after one year :
> 1) there was a big size increase between 3.0 and 3.2 , how does
> 3.4(.6) compare to that ?
> 2) whats up with the librpc/gen_ndr "Patches welcome" ?
Keep in mind 3.5.x will be release on monday, probably.
greetings
tpowa
-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20100227/ce913360/attachment.bin>