[arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

[Brendan Long]

On 01/27/2010 09:43 AM, Johann Peter Dirichlet wrote:
> cdrkit is a badly maintained software, cdrtools is far well updated
> and maintained, and both are free softwares. So, dump or AUR cdrkit,
> and if some day someone would complain with cdrtools, simply put
> cdrkit back (or create a fork of it again :D)
>    
This seems like the obvious solution. Can anyone explain what the 
problem with this is? You could always ask the guy who's been 
maintaining it on the AUR to maintain it in the official repos.

-Brendan Long