[arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit
Christos Nouskas
nous at archlinux.us
Wed Jan 27 18:39:26 EST 2010
Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> Leaving all the licenses and legal issues aside,
>
> Q) Which is better out of the two?
>
> please respond purely on technical basis.
A) cdrtools, period. Especially if you try to burn DVDs with long, non-
ascii (read 'utf8') filenames, labels and other "weird" stuff.
I had lost quite a few DVDs in the past before I remembered that it was
cdrkit the burner and not cdrtools.
But, the developer of cdrtools... that's another story. In this thread
alone, he's been asked at least twice why he doesn't dual-license cdrtools
and he conveniently ignored it.
Herr Schilling, why don't you dual-license (or, best, single-license to
GPL) cdrtools?
--
X.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list