[arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

Christos Nouskas nous at archlinux.us
Wed Jan 27 18:39:26 EST 2010


Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> Leaving all the licenses and legal issues aside,
> 
> Q) Which is better out of the two?
> 
> please respond purely on technical basis.

A) cdrtools, period. Especially if you try to burn DVDs with long, non-
ascii (read 'utf8') filenames, labels and other "weird" stuff.

I had lost quite a few DVDs in the past before I remembered that it was 
cdrkit the burner and not cdrtools.

But, the developer of cdrtools... that's another story. In this thread 
alone, he's been asked at least twice why he doesn't dual-license cdrtools 
and he conveniently ignored it.


Herr Schilling, why don't you dual-license (or, best, single-license to 
GPL) cdrtools?



-- 
X.


More information about the arch-general mailing list