[arch-general] [arch-security] Re: What should the Arch Security Team be called?

[Ananda Samaddar]

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
nepherte <nepherte at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why not just "Arch Security Team" (AST) not to be confused with
> abstract syntax trees :) No need to make things complicated.

This looks like the way to go,  if there's no more dissenters or better
suggestions.

Ananda
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20100617/5c2359ee/attachment.bin>