[arch-general] What should the Arch Security Team be called?

[Miah Johnson]

I think the name should be simple (I've already commented on AST). But I
wanted to point out, the name isn't everything. Its what the team does or
proposes to do that should be thought about. Spending too much time on a
name, while not actually doing anything is fail.

-Miah

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:18 PM, J. McBlane <toolman33 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Arch Security Enhancement Team?
> Securing Arch For Everyone?
> Arch Guard?
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:46:59PM +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> > On to the first order of business. As the subject says, what should
> > security team be called.  Hopefully we can get a few suggestions and
> > then reach a consensus. Arch Linux Security Task Force just sounds like
> > too much of a mouthful to me.
> >
> > I was brooding over this and I thought some sort of acronym that's an
> > actual word would sound better, so I came up with this:
> >
> > 'Arch Response Team for Security' or ARTS.  It's a bit cheesy and
> > cheats a bit to get the acronym but is instantly memorable.  I'm aware
> > arts was also a KDE technology but it has long since been deprecated.
> >
> > Ideas?
> >
> > Ananda
>
>
>