[arch-general] Important notice on the Arch Security Team to the whole Arch Linux community.

[Caleb Cushing]

2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee at gmail.com>:
> I'd still like to know how this replaces/conflicts with Arch policy for
> 'as upstream as possible'. I'm aware that just starting out the answer
> may just be "we don't know yet", but for me one of the benefits of Arch
> is that all packages are close to upstream (and thus its easy to discuss
> bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-patches
> from git/svn).
>

how 'bout things upstream doesn't take care of like pam.d policies...
I seem to recall there being a request for a pam policy for login
managers... as a result of my pointing out that even if your shell is
false you can login graphically.
-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com