[arch-general] Bad attitude in flyspray again!

[Aaron Griffin]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums <lists at baums-on-web.de> wrote:
>> > But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why
>> > a bug is reported even if it's invalid.
>>
>> Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in the abstract is
>> stupid. We're all grown ups, no one is going to have their feelings
>> hurt. Without them I'm sick of the back and forth on this- most devs
>> leave bugs open for more than long enough to get feedback (and don't
>> get it!), and we would all rather have bugs be either fixed or closed
>> than hang around forever.
>
> I think another problem is that the bug wranglers aren't necessarily
> involved in development and don't communicate with the developers before
> taking action on a bug. That's no fault of the developer, but is a fault
> with the bug wrangler.

Err? This sounds like quite a broad generalization without specific
examples. Do *you* have any examples you'd like to share?