[arch-general] gsfonts - package is updated?

Firmicus Firmicus at gmx.net
Fri Mar 26 08:40:16 CET 2010


On 26/03/2010 00:07, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
>> Repository     : extra
>> Name           : gsfonts
>> Version        : 1.0.7pre44-1
>> Installed      : 8.11-5
>> URL            : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
>>
>> I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version
>> numbers? The linked sourceforge page still lists 8.11 as the stable
>> version, while the one currently in extra is listed as 'pre' (and
>> doesn't seem available in the sourceforge page?
>>
>
> I guess that maintainer forgotten the force option.
> svn log message says "Use newer version of the fonts as provided by 
> Fedora's package urw-fonts Fixes FS#10593"
>
>
Oops, my fault sorry for that! I indeed forgot to use the "force" option.
Will fix that asap.
F

PS: Yes, the stupid version numbers for those fonts used upstream by the 
ghostscript project is also part of the mess I was referring to, but far 
worse it the fact that the fonts have not been released as a standalone 
tarball for so long. The fonts themselves (outlines and metrics) are of 
a  very high quality, so there is no problem in that respect. It's just 
that the ghostscript project does not seem to care releasing them. The 
tarball was generated by Fedora from the ghostscript svn repo. The new 
version not only fixes the bug mentioned above, but also adds glyphs for 
Cyrillic.


More information about the arch-general mailing list