[arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Fri May 7 11:15:28 EDT 2010
On Fri 07 May 2010 10:01 -0500, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:57 AM, David C. Rankin <
> drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> > On 05/07/2010 09:48 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Johannes Held <mail at hehejo.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> http://www.archlinux.org/news/495/
> > >>
> > >> * If you have gvim installed, the update will inform you that vim
> > >> conflicts with gvim. This is the expected behavior. Installation
> > >> of vim and gvim separately is no longer required, the gvim
> > >> package now installs vim as well.
> > >
> > > This is a rolling release, not an LTS. There is no excuse to not
> > > be updating regularly and reading the news. If its a production
> > > machine and you are worried about breakage maybe you shouldnt be
> > > running arch on it. The ML, forums, and irc are full of people who
> > > refuse to read the news or update regularly, and we all waste time
> > > answering questions that with proper arch maintenance would ensure
> > > that they never come up.
> > It's people like you that give arch a bad reputation. Grow up.
> Saying you were wrong would be the more mature avenue. I did not bash
> or call names, I stated the obvious. This is not the first time the ML
> has been posted with your obvious questions.
Yeah. If you notice something odd on your system please take the time to
read the news before asking a question. If you have some more time maybe
check the forum and wiki as well.
More information about the arch-general