[arch-general] BASH no longer does 'for i in $(ls); do ls $i; done'??
Jeroen Op 't Eynde
jeroen at xprsyrslf.be
Tue May 18 16:27:31 EDT 2010
On Tue, 18 May 2010 22:17:48 +0200, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
>
> 15:10 nirvana:~/dt/compiz/compizX11> l
> total 24
> drwxr-xr-x 6 david david 4096 May 18 15:04 .
> drwxr-xr-x 9 david dcr 4096 May 18 15:04 ..
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david david 4096 May 18 15:03 i586
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david david 4096 May 18 15:03 noarch
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david david 4096 May 18 15:03 src
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david david 4096 May 18 15:03 x86_64
>
> 15:14 alchemy:~/dt/compiz/compiz_11.0> l
> total 24
> drwxr-xr-x 6 david dcr 4096 2010-05-17 23:56 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 9 david dcr 4096 2010-05-18 10:28 ../
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david dcr 4096 2010-05-18 10:24 i586/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david dcr 4096 2010-05-17 23:56 noarch/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david dcr 4096 2010-05-18 10:22 src/
> drwxr-xr-x 2 david dcr 4096 2010-05-18 10:21 x86_64/
>
You probably did check the aliases. (and I see a difference in the first
and second '> l' with the trailing slash.
--
Jeroen Op 't Eynde - jeroen at xprsyrslf.be - http://xprsyrslf.be
To read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
More information about the arch-general
mailing list