[arch-general] Policy concerning /usr/libexec

Kaiting Chen kaitocracy at gmail.com
Thu May 20 23:29:38 EDT 2010

Hi I was wondering why the policy was to not use /usr/libexec and move what
should go there to /usr/lib/<pkgname>. While it isn't serious it seems to me
that this deviation from the default behavior is unnecessary. One scenario I
can think of where this might cause a problem is if a very security
conscious administrator wanted to mount /usr/lib as noexec.


Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/

More information about the arch-general mailing list