[arch-general] This is the "arch"-general list - Was Burning From Command Line
lists at itech7.com
Thu May 27 12:44:08 EDT 2010
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila <vodoo0904 at sonnenkinder.org> wrote:
>> At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
>>> Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads.
>>> other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed
>>> alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one.
>> +100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint
>> of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-)
> To be clear:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm going to give this the rest of the day to simmer down, then I'm
>> going to start moderating/banning accounts
> Notice that "accounts" is the plural, not the singular.
Err. I don't think you should do that unless they become a pure
nuisance. I am facing a similar situation with Squidoo. Because of
someone else on my subnet (I have static ip), spamming on their site
(or may be due to a virus, its a common scene here), they have banned
the whole subnet. And now even after several request they won't
whitelist me. You may end up banning some for none of their mistake.
More information about the arch-general