[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12 toolchain build

dave reisner d at falconindy.com
Fri May 28 17:37:50 EDT 2010

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, dave reisner <d at falconindy.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> I think gdb is fine...   but I have not used it extensively.   I'd
>> appreciate reports from anyone who has extensively used gdb and valgrind
>> with the new glibc.
>> Allan
> I've been using valgrind on the new glibc. It reports a whole new slew of
> warnings for previously "quiet" code, but otherwise performs as expected.
> Curl example: http://codepad.org/htorjWF9
> dave

Followup: I'm not able to find a whole lot of hard evidence from other
people about this behavior aside from a Cygwin related post [1] which I
can't personally reproduce. I've opened FS#19634 with a possible resolution.

[1] http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2010-05/msg00024.html


More information about the arch-general mailing list