[arch-general] Compiling Firefox

Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. jeffrey.parke at gmail.com
Sun May 30 23:21:12 EDT 2010


On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists at itech7.com>wrote:

> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
> <jeffrey.parke at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists at itech7.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27 at verizon.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 05/30/2010 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> In order to improve firefox's reponse time, I'm thinking of compiling
> >> >> firefox with gcc's -O3 and -march settings from the ABS.
> >> >> Any tips on that matter, about updates, etc. ?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Try firefox-pgo. You have to be careful with gcc options when
> compiling
> >> > firefox. The AUR's firefox-pgo sets up properly for you.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> It seems firefox-pgo is for 64bit, but I am on 32bit. I had put up a
> >> thread about upgrading to 64bit, but many suggested that it would not
> >> improve the performance much :(
> >> Should I compile after upgrading ?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nilesh Govindarajan
> >> Facebook: nilesh.gr
> >> Twitter: nileshgr
> >> Website: www.itech7.com
> >>
> >
> > it should be for both 32 and 64 bit
> >
>
>
> Hmm, I think so, the compilation should fail if not :)
> What's about firefox-qt ? Is it worth installing it ?
>
> --
> Nilesh Govindarajan
> Facebook: nilesh.gr
> Twitter: nileshgr
> Website: www.itech7.com
>


that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk one.


More information about the arch-general mailing list