[arch-general] Replace dcron once again?
kaitocracy at gmail.com
Sun Nov 7 19:57:50 CET 2010
> I'd like to go with fcron because it seems to work very well for most
> people, has a lot of features while having a small dependency tree.
I think fcron is kind of heavy for most users. I'd rather we switch to
cronie, which is the descendent of vixie-cron. It's developed by RedHat,
well maintained, supports PAM and SELinux and can be built with anacron
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
More information about the arch-general