[arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

[Kaiting Chen]

>
> I'd like to go with fcron because it seems to work very well for most
> people, has a lot of features while having a small dependency tree.
>

I think fcron is kind of heavy for most users. I'd rather we switch to
cronie, which is the descendent of vixie-cron. It's developed by RedHat,
well maintained, supports PAM and SELinux and can be built with anacron
features.

Kaiting.

-- 
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/