[arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

[Ng Oon-Ee]

On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:31 -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Not only this, but also the fact that now there are 2 crons being maintained:
> fcron in community and dcron in core. Removing dcron to, say, AUR, will be a
> wiser use of devs' time...

Bottom-posting please. And I don't see a problem with the current
situation, one is in [core] the other in [community] (devs vs TUs). It
could be reverse, if that's what's meant by 'replacing'.

As a result of this thread I've switched to fcron as well. No big deal.