[arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

[Ian-Xue Li]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:12:36AM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> There's probably one thing that could be changed in the fcron package to
> reduce the size. The complete documentation is in English as well as in
> French. Nothing against France, but the French documentation could
> probably be removed from the package.
Indeed, I did some calculations and it turns out, fcron is very small as
well, if you cut down all the unnecessary documents.

4.0K	/etc/fcron/fcron.allow
4.0K	/etc/fcron/fcron.conf
4.0K	/etc/fcron/fcron.deny
4.0K	/etc/fcron/pam.conf
4.0K	/etc/pam.d/fcron
4.0K	/etc/pam.d/fcrontab
4.0K	/etc/rc.d/fcron
32K	/usr/bin/fcrondyn
24K	/usr/bin/fcronsighup
60K	/usr/bin/fcrontab
88K	/usr/sbin/fcron
4.0K	/usr/sbin/run-cron
4.0K	/usr/share/man/man1/fcrondyn.1.gz
4.0K	/usr/share/man/man1/fcrontab.1.gz
4.0K	/usr/share/man/man3/bitstring.3.gz
4.0K	/usr/share/man/man5/fcron.conf.5.gz
12K	/usr/share/man/man5/fcrontab.5.gz
4.0K	/usr/share/man/man8/fcron.8.gz
4.0K	/var/spool/fcron/systab.orig
272K	Total

It comes down to only 272 KiB, I think this is very acceptable.

-- 
Li Ian-Xue
http://b4283.ath.cx