[arch-general] base stuff

Yaro Kasear yaro at marupa.net
Sat Apr 9 11:18:07 EDT 2011


On Friday, April 08, 2011 14:29:34 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0600
> 
> schrieb Thomas S Hatch <thatch45 at gmail.com>:
> > Yaro makes many good points, I think that my recommendation would 
be
> > to allow someone to maintain support for SELinux in community. If
> > SELinux support is deemed something that would be a good idea to 
move
> > to core in the future than do so, otherwise leave it in community.
> 
> I'd prefer a separate [selinux] repo. So that people know what they are
> doing.
> 
> I know, packages with SELinux support could and should be named
> something like selinux-XXX or XXX-selinux, but I think a new repo would
> be better and more secure - not only from SELinux' view.
> 
> This way SELinux users can just add [selinux] to pacman.conf above
> [core]. For the other users it should be deactivated by default.
> 
> Heiko

Here's another question. Isn't it general packaging policy to not fully 
support packages that have unofficial upstream patches applied? Isn't 
SELinux "unofficial" to all the upstream?


More information about the arch-general mailing list